Wednesday, August 25, 2004

Okay, Democrats. Here it is: the eyewitness account of GWB in the National Guard.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=14805

As you can see, you Rats have bitten off more than you can chew on this.

Stop the lying.

Now.

Monday, August 23, 2004

I want to give some kudos to the Minnesota Republican Party for creating a new website called 'When Angry Democrats Attack'. It can be seen at http://www.whenangrydemocratsattack.com/ .

This is the kind of thing that needs to be shown to Americans - how far off the deep end the Democrats have become.

I stand by my assertation that the Ruckus Society, ANSWER, and the rest are really one organization, modelled off of Hitler's SA brownshirts. Note, by the way, the fact they keep trying to call Bush a fascist/nazi when they are the ones embracing the goals of naziism.

Someone on Free Republic has provided a handy little list that continues my premise, which has pretty much been implied in previous accounts, that the current leadership of the Democratic Party is, in fact, the successor to the National Socialist German Workers Party...the Nazis. Why those Democrats like Dick Gephardt don't realize the path they are spiraling down and stop this is beyond my comprehension. Why the Jewish Democratic voters and the African-American Democratic voters don't understand that they are being turned into second class citizens by the party they support is mindboggling.

Here is the list:

  • Kerry and Hitler were both "War Heros" with medals.
  • Kerry and Hitler were heros in wars that their nation "lost".
  • Kerry and Hitler were both "Wounded" in that war.
  • Kerry and Hitler are both opportunists.
  • Kerry and Hitler are dedicated to overthrow the existing order.
  • Kerry and Hitler were both leaders of radical organizations willing to use violence to win.
  • Kerry and Hitler used national dissatisfaction with the war they fought in to gain political prominence.
  • Kerry and Hitler are both adopted by the super-rich as a vehicle to take political control.
  • Kerry and Hitler are both socialists.
Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. That's exactly what is happening here, but by calling us on the conservative side 'nazis', it allows them to deflect where the true nazism is coming from.

I am reprinting here the letter from the Bush-Cheney campaign concerning the Kerry campaign putting out a totally false advertisement:

Dear Station Manager:


Your station is being asked to run an ad from John Kerry's presidential campaign wrongly accusing Bush-Cheney '04 of violating the campaign finance laws. We ask that your station set the record straight.

It is completely false and without any evidence that the Bush "campaign supports a front group attacking John Kerry's military record," as the Kerry ad states. The Bush-Cheney campaign flatly rejects this baseless allegation of illegal coordination between Bush-Cheney '04 and a group called Swiftboat Veterans for Truth. The ad running on your station contains this false and libelous charge. Coordination with Swiftboat Veterans for Truth would be a violation of federal campaign finance laws. 11 C.F.R. 109.21.

Sadly, the Kerry campaign is using this falsehood for which it publicly admits it has no evidence to distract attention and gain free publicity. Attached is a verified transcript from a CNN interview in which Mr. Kerry's own spokesman, Tad Devine, could not present even one piece of hard evidence to back up the Kerry campaign's allegations.

The attached CNN Inside Politics verified transcript shows that Kerry campaign spokesman Devine is basing his charges solely on a newspaper article, "...it's in the New York Times today." However, not even this newspaper article presents evidence of "coordination." What has been reported are the Kerry campaign's unsubstantiated charges along with the explicit denial from the Bush-Cheney campaign. In fact, after inquiring about the alleged coordination reported in the New York Times story relied on by Mr. Devine, Wolf Blitzer, based on an earlier interview with a reporter who wrote the New York Times story, corrected Devine by stating, "They don't have any hard evidence backing it up." In other words, the allegation contained in the commercial running on your station is based on nothing more than the Kerry campaign's false accusations, having them reported in the media, and then the Kerry campaign referring to the published false accusations as proof.

The Kerry campaign is hiding behind the law which does not permit your station to reject this false advertising by a candidate. But your station can insure that the record is clear in your total program. We ask that you to do that.

Respectfully,

Ken Mehlman
Campaign Manager